Webroot SecureAnywhere: Revisited
Thursday, January 26th, 2012 at
11:43 pm
Join our blog! malware-geek.blogspot.com Join us on Facebook! http Follow us on Twitter! www.twitter.com
Tagged with: anti-malware • anti-virus • anti-virus test • antimalware • antivirus test • blocking malware • computer security • malware geek • Malware Prevention • malware prevention test • rynesanbergfan23 • secureanywhere • virus • virus prevention • Webroot Software • windows security
Filed under: Managed Security Services
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
yay first comment and another? nice video
I wonder how well this would work together with something like Panda Cloud? or Malwarebytes’
@fruitcoulis They? say that it can be run along side an existing security program.
If it finds 35% of the software you tested, then it has 35% chance of catching? the virus in the future.. -.-
@fruitcoulis I’ve used this with MBAM Pro for a while, now. I had to uncheck “analyze websites? for phishing threats” because MBAM is already doing that. Browsing speed is back to normal, now.
Cool new? intro.
I thought the old one to be a little corny, with the? dial up sound. XD
i use Webroot along side CIS, there is no conflict at all an the the low memory footprint doesnt? affect my system (x64) at all, I have found this combo to be bulletproof.
Ahhh… I see? where you got the intro from. :3
Intro >20 seconds =? Annoying
@FlashGamesMaster The intro is only 25 seconds dude.. . . . If you can’t sit there for? 25 seconds you are really impatient.
Yeah.? Do away with the intro. Love your reviews. Great stuff.
i like? this new intro…its awesome!
Using multiple real-time AVs is stupid. If your OS is up-to date and you don’t? run any unknown program from net you’re good. I have used Windows 7 for 2 months without any protection and didn’t get any virus. I have virtual machines for testing unknown and possible dangerous software.
On the website click on support, then product user? guides. Gives a lot of useful information.
@AClown7 Incorrect. Any AV company can add a signature for files that it doesn’t? have at any time. It’s just a case of when.
I appreciate you making this video. I am baffled by some of the low detection rates that some sources are reported. The technology is heavily based on Prevx 3.0 which had very good detection rates, although it was never tested by AV-Comparitives/AV-Test. I have done my own test of this product on a test system and found? it had a very high detection rate. I don’t know why different people are experiencing different results. Sorry for being argumentative with you before. Cheers.
every kind and any kind of protection is not fool proof, if they was not happy with your review, then they should work harder to make their product better and then ask yoiu to do another? review,,,,, right ?, just my thoghts is all